Enalapril versus nifedipino para el manejo de la hipertensión arterial postparto

Introducción: Los desórdenes hipertensivos en el embarazo son la mayor causa de morbimortalidad materna en el mundo, su tratamiento habitualmente se realiza con nifedipino o enalapril durante el postparto indistintamente, pero no hay estudios que los comparen. Metodología: Se realizó un estudio de corte transversal con fines analíticos en el cual se incluyeron las historias clínicas de pacientes con trastorno hipertensivo durante el postparto que recibieron alguno de estos dos medicamentos y se evaluó el control de tensión arterial, necesidad de otros antihipertensivos, efectos adversos, presencia de complicaciones en ambos grupos. Resultados: Se estudió una muestra representativa, homogénea de 139 pacientes (p 0,43). Todas controlaron las cifras tensionales con el medicamento recibido. El 45% (n=62) recibió enalapril 20 mg cada 12 horas, el 40% (n=56) recibió nifedipino 30 mg cada 8 horas, el 15% (n=21) recibió nifedipino 30 mg cada 12 horas. No se presentaron efectos adversos, complicaciones o mortalidad en ninguno de los grupos. Las pacientes con enalapril requirieron más antihipertensivos comparado con las pacientes que recibieron nifedipino con diferencia estadísticamente significativa (p 0,001). Discusión La escogencia de un antihipertensivo durante el postparto debe estar encaminada al tipo de trastorno antihipertensivo: aquellos que se presentan por primera vez durante el embarazo se les administra nifedipino con excelentes resultados; aquellos con antecedente de hipertensión previa se les administra enalapril con buenos resultados. Ambos medicamentos controlaron la presión arterial adecuadamente sin complicaciones ni mortalidad.

Preferential binding to elk-1 by sle-associated il10 risk allele upregulates il10 expression

Immunoregulatory cytokine interleukin-10 (IL-10) is elevated in sera from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) correlating with disease activity. The established association of IL10 with SLE and other autoimmune diseases led us to fine map causal variant(s) and to explore underlying mechanisms. We assessed 19 tag SNPs, covering the IL10 gene cluster including IL19, IL20 and IL24, for association with SLE in 15,533 case and control subjects from four ancestries. The previously reported IL10 variant, rs3024505 located at 1 kb downstream of IL10, exhibited the strongest association signal and was confirmed for association with SLE in European American (EA) (P = 2.7×10−8, OR = 1.30), but not in non-EA ancestries. SNP imputation conducted in EA dataset identified three additional SLE-associated SNPs tagged by rs3024505 (rs3122605, rs3024493 and rs3024495 located at 9.2 kb upstream, intron 3 and 4 of IL10, respectively), and SLE-risk alleles of these SNPs were dose-dependently associated with elevated levels of IL10 mRNA in PBMCs and circulating IL-10 protein in SLE patients and controls. Using nuclear extracts of peripheral blood cells from SLE patients for electrophoretic mobility shift assays, we identified specific binding of transcription factor Elk-1 to oligodeoxynucleotides containing the risk (G) allele of rs3122605, suggesting rs3122605 as the most likely causal variant regulating IL10 expression. Elk-1 is known to be activated by phosphorylation and nuclear localization to induce transcription. Of interest, phosphorylated Elk-1 (p-Elk-1) detected only in nuclear extracts of SLE PBMCs appeared to increase with disease activity. Co-expression levels of p-Elk-1 and IL-10 were elevated in SLE T, B cells and monocytes, associated with increased disease activity in SLE B cells, and were best downregulated by ERK inhibitor. Taken together, our data suggest that preferential binding of activated Elk-1 to the IL10 rs3122605-G allele upregulates IL10 expression and confers increased risk for SLE in European Americans.